Online since 2002. Over 3300 puzzles, 2600 worldwide members, and 270,000 messages.

TwistyPuzzles.com Forum
 It is currently Wed Jul 23, 2014 7:27 am

 All times are UTC - 5 hours

 Page 1 of 1 [ 8 posts ]
 Print view Previous topic | Next topic
Author Message
 Post subject: Arrow cube.Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2011 4:56 am

Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2011 7:31 pm
I can solve a rubiks cube, and an arrow cube, but I have 2 questions on the arrow cube to make me faster.

Is there a more efficient way to twist a center only 90 degrees?

And is there a more efficient way to turn a center 180, I curently do R U R' U(X5)

_________________
Monthly Average.
2x2(Horrible quality keychain cube):00:29.46
3x3(Eastsheen cube w/cubesmith tiles) 00:57.42
4x4 Don't have the algs memorized yet

Top

 Post subject: Re: Arrow cube.Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2011 9:52 am

Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 12:48 pm
Location: Italy
CS2011 wrote:

Is there a more efficient way to twist a center only 90 degrees?

And is there a more efficient way to turn a center 180, I curently do R U R' U(X5)

More efficient than what?

To rotate the U center 180°: (ULRU2L'R')*2

Top

 Post subject: Re: Arrow cube.Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2011 6:49 pm

Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 3:17 am
Location: Australia
Hi Marcom & CS2011,
Quote:
More efficient than what?
This is probably a google translate issue or language issue .
I think he means `can you` and the answer is more complex:
You can't twist a centre piece 90 deg without affecting other pieces: A 90 deg turn changes the parity of the puzzle so you would get 2 edges needing to be swapped, etc. So if you turn one centre by 90 deg, you need to turn another centre by 90 deg to correct the parity. If one centre has no orientation and the others do, it would be possible to have this `hidden` (depends on the order you are solving the cube, the method or if it has arrows on all faces).

EDIT: Maybe I'm making this too complicated:
I usually solve a supercube by taking into account the orientation of centres proactively, and using sequences that don't disrupt them. This for me is a philosophical thing, because I believe that is the challenge of the puzzle, rather than adding a fix in hindsight.
But:
RU' RU RU RU' R'U' R2 will turn the U centre (U') and the R centre (R) and not disrupt many pieces. This might be what you are after because I assume you want to fix side centres as part of a layers method? Combined with Marcom's pure algo for U, I think it is OK?

Cheers,
Burgo.

_________________
1st 3x3 solve Oct 2010 (Even though I lived through the 80s).
PB 3x3 55sec Jan 2011 (When I was a kid 1:30 was speedcubing so I'm stoked).
1st 3x3 Earth (nemesis) solve Jan 2011 My You Tube (Now has ALLCrazy 3X3 Planets with Reduction)

Top

 Post subject: Re: Arrow cube.Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 2:09 pm

Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 10:13 am
Location: Norway
Burgo wrote:
Hi Marcom & CS2011,
Quote:
More efficient than what?
This is probably a google translate issue or language issue .
I think he means `can you` and the answer is more complex:
You can't twist a centre piece 90 deg without affecting other pieces: A 90 deg turn changes the parity of the puzzle so you would get 2 edges needing to be swapped, etc. So if you turn one centre by 90 deg, you need to turn another centre by 90 deg to correct the parity. If one centre has no orientation and the others do, it would be possible to have this `hidden` (depends on the order you are solving the cube, the method or if it has arrows on all faces).

EDIT: Maybe I'm making this too complicated:
I usually solve a supercube by taking into account the orientation of centres proactively, and using sequences that don't disrupt them. This for me is a philosophical thing, because I believe that is the challenge of the puzzle, rather than adding a fix in hindsight.
But:
RU' RU RU RU' R'U' R2 will turn the U centre (U') and the R centre (R) and not disrupt many pieces. This might be what you are after because I assume you want to fix side centres as part of a layers method? Combined with Marcom's pure algo for U, I think it is OK?

Cheers,
Burgo.

Let me add a small comment to that (i could not resist).
The cube can be solved by turning only 5 layers out of the 6. One can emulate D by for example this sequence: R L' F2 B2 R L' U R' L F2 B2 R' L.

The first 6 turns move the whole D layer to the U layer and then U effectively does the D turn (after reversing the first 6 turns. So this is one longish conjugate sequence.

Obviously there is no way to reduce the number of layers for solving the cube centers as well...

Per

_________________
"Life is what happens to you while you are busy making other plans" -John Lennon, Beautiful Boy

Top

 Post subject: Re: Arrow cube.Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 2:40 pm

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 8:54 pm
Location: Bay Area, California
perfredlund wrote:
Let me add a small comment to that (i could not resist).
The cube can be solved by turning only 5 layers out of the 6. One can emulate D by for example this sequence: R L' F2 B2 R L' U R' L F2 B2 R' L.

The first 6 turns move the whole D layer to the U layer and then U effectively does the D turn (after reversing the first 6 turns. So this is one longish conjugate sequence.

Obviously there is no way to reduce the number of layers for solving the cube centers as well...

Per
This doesn't perfectly simulate a D turn because it also twists the center on the U face by 90 degrees.

I think the original poster is not asking about a super cube but a Sheperd's Cube:

On this puzzle a single center can be twisted by 90 degrees. The reason this is allowed is that there are two identical corners and a few identical edges. To resolve a single twisted center, first swap the two identical corners (they are diagonally opposite each other on a line through the center of the cube). Then swap two identical edges. This will have changed the overall twist of the centers by 90 degrees.

_________________
Prior to using my real name I posted under the account named bmenrigh.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Arrow cube.Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2012 1:06 am

Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2011 7:31 pm
bmenrigh wrote:
perfredlund wrote:
Let me add a small comment to that (i could not resist).
The cube can be solved by turning only 5 layers out of the 6. One can emulate D by for example this sequence: R L' F2 B2 R L' U R' L F2 B2 R' L.

The first 6 turns move the whole D layer to the U layer and then U effectively does the D turn (after reversing the first 6 turns. So this is one longish conjugate sequence.

Obviously there is no way to reduce the number of layers for solving the cube centers as well...

Per
This doesn't perfectly simulate a D turn because it also twists the center on the U face by 90 degrees.

I think the original poster is not asking about a super cube but a Sheperd's Cube:

On this puzzle a single center can be twisted by 90 degrees. The reason this is allowed is that there are two identical corners and a few identical edges. To resolve a single twisted center, first swap the two identical corners (they are diagonally opposite each other on a line through the center of the cube). Then swap two identical edges. This will have changed the overall twist of the centers by 90 degrees.

I was talking about a super cube, I didn't know it was impossible to turn just one center 90 degrees.

_________________
Monthly Average.
2x2(Horrible quality keychain cube):00:29.46
3x3(Eastsheen cube w/cubesmith tiles) 00:57.42
4x4 Don't have the algs memorized yet

Top

 Post subject: Re: Arrow cube.Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2012 5:04 am

Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 11:48 am
Location: In Front Of My Teraminx (saying WTF?)
U (MEM'E') U' (EME'M')

That's switch the U center orientation by 90° clockwise and the R orientation by 90° counterclockwise, then ou can adapt with other cases, it's really easy.

_________________
My Shapeways Shop!
My Designs
My Official Results
My Website on Twisty Puzzles with Gears

Grégoire Pfennig

Top

 Post subject: Re: Arrow cube.Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2012 12:55 pm

Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 10:13 am
Location: Norway
bmenrigh wrote:
perfredlund wrote:
Let me add a small comment to that (i could not resist).
The cube can be solved by turning only 5 layers out of the 6. One can emulate D by for example this sequence: R L' F2 B2 R L' U R' L F2 B2 R' L.

The first 6 turns move the whole D layer to the U layer and then U effectively does the D turn (after reversing the first 6 turns. So this is one longish conjugate sequence.

Obviously there is no way to reduce the number of layers for solving the cube centers as well...

Per
This doesn't perfectly simulate a D turn because it also twists the center on the U face by 90 degrees.

I think the original poster is not asking about a super cube but a Sheperd's Cube:

On this puzzle a single center can be twisted by 90 degrees. The reason this is allowed is that there are two identical corners and a few identical edges. To resolve a single twisted center, first swap the two identical corners (they are diagonally opposite each other on a line through the center of the cube). Then swap two identical edges. This will have changed the overall twist of the centers by 90 degrees.

Yes i mentioned it does not perfectly simulate a D turn. But i did think the original post was a bout a supercube (or picturecube). Shepherd's cube is indeed different - and confusing.

Per

_________________
"Life is what happens to you while you are busy making other plans" -John Lennon, Beautiful Boy

Top

 Display posts from previous: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by AuthorPost timeSubject AscendingDescending
 Page 1 of 1 [ 8 posts ]

 All times are UTC - 5 hours

#### Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests

 You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forumYou cannot edit your posts in this forumYou cannot delete your posts in this forumYou cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
 Jump to:  Select a forum ------------------ Announcements General Puzzle Topics New Puzzles Puzzle Building and Modding Puzzle Collecting Solving Puzzles Marketplace Non-Twisty Puzzles Site Comments, Suggestions & Questions Content Moderators Off Topic