Online since 2002. Over 3300 puzzles, 2600 worldwide members, and 270,000 messages.

TwistyPuzzles.com Forum

It is currently Fri Jul 25, 2014 8:51 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Mathematics for The Confused
PostPosted: Mon Sep 13, 2004 6:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2003 11:44 am
Location: Leicester. United Kingdom.
This is referred to as a chestnut but it amuses me.

x = 1

Therefore: x² = x

x² - 1 = x -1

Factorising x² - 1 we get

(x - 1)(x + 1) = x - 1

Dividing both sides by (x - 1) we get:

x + 1 = 1


Substituting 1 for x we get:

2 = 1


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 13, 2004 9:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2004 10:59 am
Location: READING, ohio
I LEARND THAt in class yesterday

_________________
:scrambled: :solved: CUBE HEAD :solved: :scramble:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: :P
PostPosted: Mon Sep 13, 2004 10:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 7:40 am
Location: Minnesota, USA
every stupid person knows 2 doesnt equal one.

if x=1, and u devide by x-1, then x-1=1-1=0

DIVisION BY ZERO!!!!!!!!! not allowed

fallacious

_________________
Generations of Cubists
G1(craze): '80 - '85
G2(dark ages): '86 - '98
G3(spark): '99 - '03
G4(blossom): '04 - mid '07
G5(degradation): mid '07 - present (aka: youtube generation)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 15, 2004 2:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 30, 1999 4:29 pm
Location: New Brunswick, Canada
hmmmmmmmmmm.......fun yes, but misleading isn't it?

this is how i see it:

x = ?

Therefore: x² = (x)(x)

x² - 1 = (x)(x)-1

Factorising x² - 1 we get

(x - 1)(x + 1) = (x)(x)-1

Dividing both sides by (x - 1) we get:

(x - 1)(x + 1) / (x-1) = (x)(x)-1 / (x-1)


Substituting 1 for x we get:

0 = 0

I'm not a math student, so I wanna know, if your factorising numbers can produce a multiplication by zero is it not faulty math?

just curious.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 15, 2004 2:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2003 7:29 am
Location: San Diego, California
heres another one for you

this is how .999 = 1


.999 divided by 3 = .333

.333 = 1/3

1/3 x 3 =1

hows that work out?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: mhm
PostPosted: Wed Sep 15, 2004 2:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 7:40 am
Location: Minnesota, USA
well,

0.99999... does = 1

what is 1 - 0.99999999... =?

It equals 0.0000...(infinite 0s)...001 right?

Well, if you have infinite zeros,

0.0000...(infinite 0s)...001 = 0

So
.99999... = 1

_________________
Generations of Cubists
G1(craze): '80 - '85
G2(dark ages): '86 - '98
G3(spark): '99 - '03
G4(blossom): '04 - mid '07
G5(degradation): mid '07 - present (aka: youtube generation)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 15, 2004 3:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2002 1:10 am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Adam Zamora wrote:
.999 divided by 3 = .333
.333 = 1/3
1/3 x 3 =1


Obviously .333 doesn't equal 1/3. Rounding error.

Sandy


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 15, 2004 3:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2002 1:10 am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Here's a few stolen from the net:

x^2 = x + x + . . . + x (With x terms on the right, x^2 = x * x.)
2 x = 1 + 1 + . . . + 1 (Take the derivative of each side.)
2 x = x (We added up the x 1's on the right.)
2 = 1 (Divide both sides by x.)

-------------------------------------------------------------

Whoever Knows the Least Earns the Most (the Dilbert Equation)

Engineers and scientists can never earn as much as business execs and sales reps. This can be supported by a mathematical theorem based on two postulates:

P1: Knowledge is Power
P2: Time is Money.

Basic physics definition: Power = Work / Time
Substituting the postulates, Knowledge = Work / Money
A little algebra gives us: Money = Work / Knowledge
Now as Knowledge --> 0 , Money --> oo (infinity).
So for any amount of work: Whoever knows the least earns the most!

Sandy


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 15, 2004 3:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2003 7:29 am
Location: San Diego, California
____
.999

____
.333

thats what i ment. bars over the # mean that it infinate #s


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 12:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 7:03 am
Location: Koblenz, Germany
_
0.9 = 1

It may be some kind confusing in the first place but I asked my math professor this question two years ago and according to my memory the answer was:
They are two different writings for the same number. They are the same because you can not name a number which is greater than the first and lower than the last. And that is a condition for different real numbers.
So Adam is right.

Andreas


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 5:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2004 3:30 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas
i just learned that too haha

_________________
PLL 15/21
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ve-Drdc8HMg
OLD NAME : Kid_with_teh_mohawk
pb 22.19
pb avg
27.61 = 26.74, 26.69, 26.98, 23.16, 26.14, 24.63, 23.71, (22.19), 30.41, (35.42), 34.97, 32.69


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 23, 2004 6:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2000 9:11 pm
Location: Dubuque, IA area
Here's another way to really prove that 0.99999..... is EXACTLY equal to 1 :

set x=0.999999.....

then by multiplying both sides by 10:

10x=9.999999.....

subtracting the equations from one another:

10x=9.999999.....
- x=0.999999.....
---------------------
9x=9

simplifying:

x=1

so x=0.9999999.....=1 EXACTLY!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: infinites
PostPosted: Tue Sep 28, 2004 1:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2003 11:17 am
They way I learned that was

1/9 = .11111111111 unending

+8/9 = .88888888888 unending

___
9/9 = .99999999999 unending = 1

but you can see what's happening with 1 - 0.99999999999 unending = 0, because one minus .9 would be .1, but you don't get that because 1 minus .09 = .01 but you don't get that because of because 1 minus .009 = .001 and so forth. You never get to that .000000whatever1 because you never run out of nines.

Infinites are interesting things.

I have a calculator which gives an error if I try to take the square root of zero or a negative number, but gives the answer 1 for the square root of negative zero!

David J


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 28, 2004 1:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2003 7:29 am
Location: San Diego, California
if only we can take this information and turn it into money and find a way to get $.01 for every dollar and do it 10,000,000 times then we would be millionaires.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 28, 2004 2:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2004 8:31 pm
Location: Arvada, CO
Adam Zamora wrote:
if only we can take this information and turn it into money and find a way to get $.01 for every dollar and do it 10,000,000 times then we would be millionaires.


Didn't Richard Pryor do that in Superman III?

_________________
"It's like an alarm clock, WOO WOO" -Bubb Rubb


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 01, 2004 10:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 12:45 pm
Location: Rochester, MN
skeneegee wrote:
Adam Zamora wrote:
if only we can take this information and turn it into money and find a way to get $.01 for every dollar and do it 10,000,000 times then we would be millionaires.


Didn't Richard Pryor do that in Superman III?


Yes, they also did it in Office Space, asking if it was done in Superman III.

Anyways, I had a professor in college that said most of the 0 = 1 proofs always had a divide by zero somewhere in them. Also, infinity is a concept, not a number.

A more interesting proof we did was actually proving that if you multiply 9 by any number add recursively add the digits, you'll get 9. And then we expaned on it and shows that for any base n, if you multiply by (n-1) and recursively add, you'll get (n-1).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 02, 2004 10:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2004 3:30 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas
haha i remmber that, i watched it again a couple nights ago

_________________
PLL 15/21
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ve-Drdc8HMg
OLD NAME : Kid_with_teh_mohawk
pb 22.19
pb avg
27.61 = 26.74, 26.69, 26.98, 23.16, 26.14, 24.63, 23.71, (22.19), 30.41, (35.42), 34.97, 32.69


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 04, 2004 9:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2002 1:10 am
Location: Toronto, Canada
blogan wrote:
And then we expaned on it and shows that for any base n, if you multiply by (n-1) and recursively add, you'll get (n-1).


That's pretty interesting. I never would have thought of that. It certainly holds true for the built-in base 2, 8 and 16 features on the Windows calculator, as long as you don't multiply n-1 by 0, that is.

Sandy


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

Forum powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group