View unanswered posts | View active topics
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 14 posts ] |
|
| Author |
Message |
|
IlTallDude
|
Post subject: Beating Tony Fishers giant 2x2? Posted: Tue Jul 26, 2011 8:36 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 12:51 pm
|
This thread is a concept that I had, and wanted to share with the forum, not a something i am working on currently.When I saw Tony Fishers giant 2x2 here a while back I wondered if one could make a bigger or more stable one. I think you could if you took a yj crazy foot cube and then bandaged and extended it. I'm not going to do this any time soon but if you want to try it (and maybe even best Tony Fisher  ) then I recommend trying it. I want to see if it works.
Last edited by IlTallDude on Tue Jul 26, 2011 9:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Kapusta
|
Post subject: Re: Beating Toney Fishers giant 2x2? Posted: Tue Jul 26, 2011 8:43 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 7:06 pm Location: Nowhere in particular.
|
|
Erm, why go through the trouble of bandaging and heavily modifying a 3x3 when you can simply extend a 2x2 with plastic sheeting? Much, much easier process. Unless there's some sort of constraint I'm just not seeing, I think you could make a 2x2 with this method as giant as you wanted.
_________________ ~Kapusta
PB: At home (In Competition) 2x2 1.xx (2.88) 3x3 11.xx (15.81) 4x4 1:18.26 (1:24.63) 5x5 (3:00.02) 6x6 4:26.05 (6:34.68) 7x7 6:54.62 (9:48.81) OH (35.63)
Current Goals: 7x7 sub 6:45 4x4 sub 1:10
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
IlTallDude
|
Post subject: Re: Beating Toney Fishers giant 2x2? Posted: Tue Jul 26, 2011 8:51 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 12:51 pm
|
|
Well the reason being is that the crazy foot is a bigger puzzle and provide more stability than a smaller 2x2 or 4x4
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Kapusta
|
Post subject: Re: Beating Toney Fishers giant 2x2? Posted: Tue Jul 26, 2011 8:53 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 7:06 pm Location: Nowhere in particular.
|
|
In that case, bandage a 4x4 instead. They aren't AS big as a Crazy Foot Cube, but they also require almost no modding, just some supergluing.
_________________ ~Kapusta
PB: At home (In Competition) 2x2 1.xx (2.88) 3x3 11.xx (15.81) 4x4 1:18.26 (1:24.63) 5x5 (3:00.02) 6x6 4:26.05 (6:34.68) 7x7 6:54.62 (9:48.81) OH (35.63)
Current Goals: 7x7 sub 6:45 4x4 sub 1:10
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
IlTallDude
|
Post subject: Re: Beating Toney Fishers giant 2x2? Posted: Tue Jul 26, 2011 8:56 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 12:51 pm
|
|
.. well yes but the modification wouldn't be that complex and the goal of this is not to make the puzzle build faster, but to make a better resulting puzzle
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
pirsquared
|
Post subject: Re: Beating Toney Fishers giant 2x2? Posted: Tue Jul 26, 2011 9:01 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 6:46 pm Location: Evanston, IL
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
KelvinS
|
Post subject: Re: Beating Tony Fishers giant 2x2? Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 4:42 am |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:13 pm
|
|
The main problem is that the puzzle will become very unstable and fragile (high turning forces) if it is made bigger without increasing the size of the mechanism. A long stick is much easier to break then a short stick of the same thickness. Ideally you need to increase the size of the mechanism in proportion to the puzzle, just as you need to increase the thickness of a stick as you make it longer. And just to clarify, I'm talking about proportionality of *all linear dimensions*, not surfaces or volume.
_________________ I'm going wherever they value my loyalty the most.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Tony Fisher
|
Post subject: Re: Beating Tony Fishers giant 2x2? Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 5:24 am |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 7:37 pm
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
BN
|
Post subject: Re: Beating Tony Fishers giant 2x2? Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 9:14 am |
|
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 4:35 am
|
|
For the sake of stability, I'd go with the crazy foot cube. A normal 2x2 would work but, personally, I'd be bothered by the thought of it all being held together by such a small inner 3x3.
_________________
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
theVDude
|
Post subject: Re: Beating Tony Fishers giant 2x2? Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 9:26 am |
|
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 2:57 pm Location: Pittsburgh
|
|
Or build a larger 3x3x3 base. D: Maybe I'll do that.
_________________ 3x3x3 PB: 00:48.10 "Study gravitation, it's a field with a lot of potential."
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
IlTallDude
|
Post subject: Re: Beating Tony Fishers giant 2x2? Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:48 am |
|
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 12:51 pm
|
theVDude wrote: Or build a larger 3x3x3 base. D: Maybe I'll do that. like build a 3x3 from scratch? wow.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
theVDude
|
Post subject: Re: Beating Tony Fishers giant 2x2? Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 11:45 am |
|
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 2:57 pm Location: Pittsburgh
|
|
I'll need a bunch of plastic sheet and more time then I have, but the measurements and angles are easy at least. LOL.
_________________ 3x3x3 PB: 00:48.10 "Study gravitation, it's a field with a lot of potential."
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
IlTallDude
|
Post subject: Re: Beating Tony Fishers giant 2x2? Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:01 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 12:51 pm
|
|
I guess it would be easier than i thought... it'd just take time (like anything). Maybe make the biggest 3x3 with proportional mechanism?
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Tony Fisher
|
Post subject: Re: Beating Tony Fishers giant 2x2? Posted: Sat Jul 30, 2011 2:46 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 7:37 pm
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 14 posts ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
|