Online since 2002. Over 3300 puzzles, 2600 worldwide members, and 270,000 messages.

TwistyPuzzles.com Forum
 It is currently Wed Jul 23, 2014 6:05 pm

 All times are UTC - 5 hours

 Page 1 of 1 [ 16 posts ]
 Print view Previous topic | Next topic
Author Message
 Post subject: New k4x4x4 VideoPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 4:37 pm

Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 10:48 am
Some people requested a new video of how I perform this method these days.

Here ya go;

1:05.06

The basic method is essencially the same, but there are some optimizations made for speed. (Eg, no rotation during placing edges)

_________________
#

Top

 Post subject: Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 5:11 pm

Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 4:42 pm
Very nice Thom. I see you restickered your cube too .

Top

 Post subject: Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 5:17 pm

Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 4:39 pm
Location: Enschede, The Netherlands, First room on the left on the 2nd floor.
that was an impressive last layer, I wish mine was as fast as yours too. Mostly I get F3L in about 43-50 sec, but the last layer kills me...

_________________
getting lucky is not a crime...

Top

 Post subject: Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 8:34 pm

Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 2:49 pm
Location: Pennsylvania
OK, here is Speedy asking another really really stupid question...

I am interested in learning a new method for 4x4, mostly to be different, but also because I believe that the 4x4 could be done very quickly using something other then CE3 methods.

My stupid question is, what is the difference between the cage method and the k4 method? I know cage is like first layer, middle edges, last layer then centers.

So how does the K4 work? If it is easier/faster then the cage, I might be interested in learning

sorry for the stupid question, but it just had to be asked sooner or later! Especially since I'm getting faster at CE3, which would make me less likely to want to switch over...

_________________
Do it.

Top

 Post subject: Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 8:57 pm

Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 10:48 am
Simplified;

White + Yellow centres
Do some of the first layer
Other centres
Finish first layer
F3L
LL

The main difference between mine and cage is that I do the centres at a different part. If I do them at that point, I don't have to solve the centres with commutators, and instead, I can use a semi-standard method of solving them. (By like I mean similar to CE3).

watermelon wrote:
Very nice Thom. I see you restickered your cube too :wink:.

Yeah, eastsheen stickers were just falling off. I also lubed again it in the same session. My eastsheen is smooth :)

Erik wrote:
that was an impressive last layer, I wish mine was as fast as yours too. Mostly I get F3L in about 43-50 sec, but the last layer kills me...

What's your F3L method? Mine sucks, maybe we can help each other out? :)

_________________
#

Top

 Post subject: Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 1:44 am

Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 12:12 pm
Location: NY, USA
What are you doing for the 1x3x4 block and the F3L sections? I can't understand what you're doing from the video...

_________________
My official times
Puzzle Solving Service! - a puzzle that has never been scrambled and solved has been wasted.

Top

 Post subject: Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 2:18 am

Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 10:28 pm
Location: Austin, Texas
I'm new to the 4x and I'm trying out your method. Normally I do the centers - pair edges - 3x solve method. I'm a little slow because for 3x I only know LBL (yes, I'm lame but I am working on Petrus right now).

With the limited knowledge of piece movement that I have I managed to get to the F3L step and now I'm stuck. All 8 corners are in place and I cannot for the life of me figure out how to get the edges where you want without messing the corners up.

I've tried moving them out of the way to pair the edge piece and then bringing it back into place but that either ejects the newely placed edge piece or sends a D corner into the top layer. I'm confused...

I do want to say though that I really like this method so far. It's a different approach and I like it because unlike my prior cubing history I am actually figuring out some stuff on my own

Top

 Post subject: Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 3:44 am

Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 4:39 pm
Location: Enschede, The Netherlands, First room on the left on the 2nd floor.
I'd do:
opposite centers
fix 3 edges
fix centers
pair up the last edge + one of the middle layer edges (this can't be done always)
Do a partial F2L with at least 1 edge.
This was you only have to 'pure' insert about 3 pieces.
Fix corners in 1 alg (I don't know all yet)
Then mess around with some commutators with which I'm slow, I often end with things like 2 unsolved edges only, realy irritating. If my last edges were faster I maybe would switch from method...

_________________
getting lucky is not a crime...

Top

 Post subject: Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 5:54 am

Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 12:40 pm
Location: Marske-By-The-Sea, UK
My LL edges aren't optimal but I use a series of 5 cycles and 3 cycles to solve them.
I always shoot to Br or Bl using:
r U r' U2 r U r' with inverse and mirror and also a double.
I use this to solve Br Bl Fr and Fl.
I then solve the last two edge pairs with a 3cycle:
(r U2 r' U r U r')(l' U2 l U' l' U' l), again using the inverse/mirror.

I then fix the parity if needed.

I can't remember exactly how long it takes me.

_________________
List of Speedcubing methods
Speedcubing tutorial

@.=split(//,"J huhesartc kPaeenrro,lt");do{print\$.[\$_];\$_=(\$_+3)%25;}while(\$_!=0);

Top

 Post subject: Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 11:38 am

Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 10:48 am
My last layer technique is thus;

Corners (1 alg)
Final edges + parity (1 or 2 algs, depending on parity)

I deviate from this a lot for shortcuts, but it's generally what I do.

I solve two adjacent edges first because it's faster to solve the last two pairs if they're next to each other.

I was thinking of learning some algs for a 3-look last layer.

_________________
#

Top

 Post subject: Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 8:36 am

Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 11:15 am
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Erik wrote:
that was an impressive last layer, I wish mine was as fast as yours too.

Exactly what I was thinking. I'm probably twice that slow... Very nice, Thom!

Erik wrote:
Mostly I get F3L in about 43-50 sec, but the last layer kills me...

That's really fast, I average around a minute. My method (at the moment, it's still evolving):
1. 1x3x4-block
2. Opposite 1x3x4-block
3. D-center
4. Finish F3L

Top

 Post subject: Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 2:56 pm

Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 12:40 pm
Location: Marske-By-The-Sea, UK
Thom wrote:
I solve two adjacent edges first because it's faster to solve the last two pairs if they're next to each other.

Care to explain further?(farther?)

_________________
List of Speedcubing methods
Speedcubing tutorial

@.=split(//,"J huhesartc kPaeenrro,lt");do{print\$.[\$_];\$_=(\$_+3)%25;}while(\$_!=0);

Top

 Post subject: Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 2:58 pm

Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 2:49 pm
Location: Pennsylvania
I've gotten thinking (uh oh...), and what if you tried making like a super petrus method for the 4x4? Like, build a block in one corner, and just keep extending it until you have F3L done. On a 4x4 you would have a lot of room to work and move pieces around, but I haven't gotten around to trying this yet, so I'm not sure how well it would work.

_________________
Do it.

Top

 Post subject: Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 4:20 pm

Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 12:40 pm
Location: Marske-By-The-Sea, UK
Unless it's just me, it's a bit tricky to do, doesn't seem optimal for speed.

_________________
List of Speedcubing methods
Speedcubing tutorial

@.=split(//,"J huhesartc kPaeenrro,lt");do{print\$.[\$_];\$_=(\$_+3)%25;}while(\$_!=0);

Top

 Post subject: Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 3:04 pm

Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 2:49 pm
Location: Pennsylvania
Not unless you could learn different tricks for it. The idea seems valid, if there were a fast way to throw things together... I'm going to give it a whirl now, I'll let you know how it goes...

_________________
Do it.

Top

 Post subject: Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 3:19 pm

Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 2:49 pm
Location: Pennsylvania
Ok, I solved using this blockish method until I got to the LL, which I cannot solve on my own

I first build a 3x3x3 block, I did this by building 3 centers, then pairing up some edges I need, paired those edges with corners, and solved the 3x3x3 block.

I extended it by building another center, which left two slots to fill using a K4/Cage styled "insert piece by piece" approach.

So here I am with the LL... This method might have some promise to it, depending on how fast you can get the 3x3x3 block done, it seems to consume the most time.

_________________
Do it.

Top

 Display posts from previous: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by AuthorPost timeSubject AscendingDescending
 Page 1 of 1 [ 16 posts ]

 All times are UTC - 5 hours

#### Who is online

Users browsing this forum: themathkid and 9 guests

 You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forumYou cannot edit your posts in this forumYou cannot delete your posts in this forumYou cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
 Jump to:  Select a forum ------------------ Announcements General Puzzle Topics New Puzzles Puzzle Building and Modding Puzzle Collecting Solving Puzzles Marketplace Non-Twisty Puzzles Site Comments, Suggestions & Questions Content Moderators Off Topic