Online since 2002. Over 3300 puzzles, 2600 worldwide members, and 270,000 messages.

TwistyPuzzles.com Forum

It is currently Mon Apr 21, 2014 2:33 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Square-1 parity question
PostPosted: Sun Nov 06, 2011 10:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2006 12:52 am
I have a case on my square-1 that I can't solve where only two edges of one layer are swapped. I am not looking for an algorithm as much as for an explenation how that is possible. I can 3-cycle edges pure and also corners can be 3-cycled just like on a 3x3x2. Since edges and corners behave exactly the same on the puzzle (8 "identical" pieces) how can such a two-swap parity occur on only one part of pieces? If I do a 90° turn I get rid of the edge parity but create a corner parity.
What's happening there?

_________________
Life is simple.
eat. sleep. train. repeat.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Square-1 parity question
PostPosted: Sun Nov 06, 2011 10:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 8:37 am
Location: Germany
Hi alaskajoe,


have a look to this
http://www.twistypuzzles.com/forum/view ... t=square+1
perhaps this explains it. Specifically the parity.


Cheers,
Andrea


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Square-1 parity question
PostPosted: Sun Nov 06, 2011 11:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 8:54 pm
Location: Bay Area, California
alaskajoe wrote:
I have a case on my square-1 that I can't solve where only two edges of one layer are swapped. I am not looking for an algorithm as much as for an explenation how that is possible. I can 3-cycle edges pure and also corners can be 3-cycled just like on a 3x3x2. Since edges and corners behave exactly the same on the puzzle (8 "identical" pieces) how can such a two-swap parity occur on only one part of pieces? If I do a 90° turn I get rid of the edge parity but create a corner parity.
What's happening there?

As you have noticed, when the puzzle is in the cubic shape, a dihedral turn swaps two corners and two edges and a 2 swaps for the corners in even and 2 swaps for the edges is even. As long as you stay in a cubic state you can't find a move that violates this.

When you move out of a cubic state though you can arrange different number of swaps for the edges and corners. For example, what Jaap calls the "Scallop" pattern:
Image
If you arrange both the top and bottom into this pattern then if you do a dihedral turn with 3 corners swapping with 3 other corners you have changed the parity of the corners independent of the edges. This is just one example of many. I haven't reverse engineered any "parity fix" routines to see what swaps there are doing but i suspect they aren't using the Scallop pattern.

_________________
Prior to using my real name I posted under the account named bmenrigh.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Square-1 parity question
PostPosted: Sun Nov 06, 2011 12:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2006 12:52 am
Thanks to you both. I thought once it's as far as I had it, it can be solved without breaking the cubic shape again.

_________________
Life is simple.
eat. sleep. train. repeat.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

Forum powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group