B12C111

Andreas Nortmann · **Posted:** Sun Oct 04, 2009 6:26 am

The pictures should speak for themselves.
I hope everyone understands what is going on here...

Three additional points to make:
1. Three bridges would have been sufficient but not as symmetric as this version.
2. This will be the last piece of megabandaging, on a 3x3x3 that is.
3. This idea (again) has the same source as the Face-bridged cube and the three ColumcCubes.

Enjoy!

KelvinS · **Joined:** Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:13 pm

OK, you are now honoured with the title: "King of Wacky Bandaging". :lol:

APJ · **Joined:** Sat Jul 11, 2009 1:09 pm **Location:** My House

There is no way that that thing's real. It obviously has 4 dimensions no matter what Tony says :lol:

!

Alex

Arch Wolf · **Posted:** Sun Oct 04, 2009 10:15 am

each face on here reminds me of an icthus. on a serious note, nice job on the mod

RoboticFresca · **Posted:** Sun Oct 04, 2009 10:52 am

4 dimensions? try 4.5!

Steryne · **Posted:** Sun Oct 04, 2009 11:38 am

All of your bandaged puzzles coming out recently have been very unique.

Frank Tiex · **Posted:** Sun Oct 04, 2009 12:39 pm

I'd like to see this either next week in DUS or at the DCD

Really cool, I like your very systematical, mathematical approach.

Frank

elijah · **Joined:** Sat Mar 29, 2008 12:55 am **Location:** WA, USA

I don't understand... Can it only turn through the centers??

MonkeyZ · **Joined:** Tue Aug 11, 2009 3:59 pm **Location:** NJ

Crazy build, dude. Awesome!

clauswe · **Joined:** Tue Dec 09, 2008 1:05 am

I am missen the 7th one:

QuadCube-1-1+1+1
QuadCube-2-2+2+2
ColumCube c+c+c+c
ColumnCube e+e
ColumeCube ce+ce
B12C111

Where is the mistake?

Andreas Nortmann · **Posted:** Mon Oct 05, 2009 12:35 pm

Thanks for all the comments so far.

Steryne wrote:

All of your bandaged puzzles coming out recently have been very unique.

They had to be: viewtopic.php?f=14&t=15016

Frank Tiex wrote:

I'd like to see this either next week in DUS or at the DCD

Really cool, I like your very systematical, mathematical approach.

And who carries my baggage?

This approach was indeed systematical. I was afraid it might be to abstract.

elijah wrote:

I don't understand... Can it only turn through the centers??

This is the first (as far as I know) implementation of the slices-only-group. Yes. It can only turn through the centers.

clauswe wrote:

I am missen the 7th one:
*snip*
Where is the mistake?

It might be either the BF111
http://www.twistypuzzles.com/forum/view ... 15&t=14342
or the B4E111 which I didn't need to implement (see the thread mentioned above)
or I don't understand your question.

@KelvinScott: While explaining the QuadrupletsCubes to another attendant at DCD2008 I had the idea to make this analysis and since then wanted to implement the missing variants.

elijah · **Joined:** Sat Mar 29, 2008 12:55 am **Location:** WA, USA

doesn't that make the puzzle extremely easy? I don't think you can scramble a puzzle much, centers only...

Andreas Nortmann · **Posted:** Tue Oct 06, 2009 10:43 am

elijah wrote:

doesn't that make the puzzle extremely easy? I don't think you can scramble a puzzle much, centers only...

Isn't that enough?

Anyway. There are 768 different permutations. That is four time the number of the Floppy cube.
Speaking about the FloppyCube: 768 should be small enough to make up a Devils algorithm like Jaap did for the Floppy cube.

Rubiks5113 · **Joined:** Mon Sep 07, 2009 9:40 am

Very interesting, I like it!

B12C111

Who is online